We make periodic adjustments to the bench temperatures to keep them within an acceptable range.
These adjustments are visible as small step functions in the plot.
Rock will make a proposal for tuning the bench temperatures. (05/29/2012)
The profile of the CCD temperatures changes around eclipse season, with a slight increase
in the minimum daily temperature apparent from roughly 1 month before the start of eclipse
season to one month after the end of eclipse season.
The forward temperature is climbing slowly. The window is slowly degrading,
changing the temperature distribution (which affects the focus), so we have been
periodically increasing the temperature, to drive the focus down. The front window
degradation should have stabilized, ut we will keep asjusting the temperatures about
twice a year.
How many degress/year is an acceptable rate? (05/29/2012)
When do we run out of control authority - what value? (08/13/2012)
Comfortable margin for 10 years: ~ 1deg/year, heater adjusts are ~ 1%/year (08/13/2012)
201308 - Trending upwards, but not close to upper limits (48/50 C yellow/red limits for mounting ring).
The CEB temperatures follow an annual cycle. They also dip down during spacecraft
maneuvers and eclipses, when the CEB is recieving less Solar radiation.
The door temperatures follow an annual cycle, and is rising slowly as the surface treatment degrades. There are several jumps in the temperature
at the beginning of the mission, which correspond with similar jumps in the front window
temperatures.
201308 - Similar to front window but at a lower temperature. Bears watching because it's an indication of
the front window environment but the rising trend is not a concern at this time.
There are small dips correlated to the eclipse periods caused by the fact less heat is absorbed from the sun. (05/29/2012)
The daily trend is due to "box" temps. (05/29/2012)
201308 - Drop in Lyot temperature noted at the time of the processor reset. May be due to use of primary versus
redundant heater or some other factor. This needs investigation. Processor reset (April 2013) is seen in several plots
but this is a notable difference in behavior.
Please note the data for the mission long plot through the first quarter of 2011 are erroneous.
Please ignore the low values in this part of the mission long plot.
Possibly smooth to show the eclipse or other trends. (05/29/2012)
201308 - Processor reset evident, including recovery time for getting the current back on track.
Possible downward trend in motor currents? Due to motors wearing in? (12/04/2012)
201308 - There was a notable difference in behavior at the time of the processor reset. Maximum motor
current is lower after reset and there are consistently fewer zero minimum values. Rock thinks this may
be due to the spin tests run during the recovery redistributing the motor lubricant. It was noted that
spin tests should be run yearly.
The Polarization Selector move times exhibit a slight temperature dependence (increasing
times with decreasing temerature), as well as a small annual variation.
The downward trend in PS 3 may be due to general "wearing in" of the motor.
Is this trend going to be a problem? Dave Akin is contact. (05/29/2012)
Bi-weekly changes in delay time is due to Detune calibration procedure (12/04/2012)
201308 - Notable difference in behavior at the time of the processor reset. Shorter delay, lubricant?
Need to clean up the plots (fix range?) (05/29/2012)
On March 29 there was a "blip", Zoe found the cause:
On 29-Mar-2012 19:30 UT until 30-Mar-2012 19:35 UT, HMI ran framelist:
# FTSID
FrameList
Cadence
T_Offset
T_Flags
Repeat
Skip
3034
lin_cal_6Cv02.f
135
0
DAY
1
39
This framelist is a calibration that measures linearity and takes a number of dark current images and light images with a range of exposures. The linearity calibration referenced exposure indices from 1 to 31 during the 24 hour period.
(05/29/2012)
Jump in exposure time is to compensate for front window darkening. (12/04/2012)
What is the cause for the change in quality for camera 1 in ~ Dec 2010? (12/04/2012)
The max number of steps is 1500. One step ~ 1/3 arcsec. Plot show how SC is deforming slightly from
thermal changes throughout the year. (12/04/2012)
201308 - We should be able to fill in the gaps in 2012 and 2013. 2013 is likely due to the processor reset and
some values may be outside of the plot limits.
The offset plot becomes more scattered with sunspots because the sharpness
algorithm gets confused. Therefore the focus determination is really only accurate
to +/- 1 focus step.
The downward trend on the "temp corrected" best focus offset plot is due to front window darkening.
This plot shows what the focus position would be had we not made temperature changes to keep it ~ 11.1 (12/04/2012)
201308 - Keeping in range using thermal control.
201308 - It was noted that the annual variation has less impact as the optics age.
201308 - Notable drops due to a calibration run error in 2011 and the processor reset in 2013. Shorter EVE
Cruciforms are also notable for shorter spikes in the plot.
HMI Timer Violations (HSQ204) Instrument Anomaly Report (IAR) #10: Timer violations of usually 1-2 ticks may
be registered at the end of the calibration mode flat field frame list when it is run by timed script along with
other weekly calibrations. This is likely due to slight variations in the time needed for data compression of the
flat field and does not occur consistently when calibration sequences are run. Example ANS message received is:
EGSE message: ERROR :stol_exec:19:36:57: EIP: ssim_tm: HSQ204 25009 Timer for frame 23 from framelist 1083
has been violated by 2 tick(s). See also https://hmi.lmsal.com/IAR/vcur/SDOIAR0010